bug#57000: closed (Wrong entry "c-mode" in definition prefix for semantic)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 5 Aug 2022 20:27:35 +0200
with message-id 
<CADwFkmkn=zLhD434L2mmv7CU2CxrsEVnbCipHsOyeqKvcHvRfQ@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#57000: Wrong entry "c-mode" in definition prefix for 
semantic
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #57000,
regarding Wrong entry "c-mode" in definition prefix for semantic
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
57000: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=57000
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Wrong entry "c-mode" in definition prefix for semantic
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 5 Aug 2022 12:06:06 +0200
>
>
>
>
> Severity: minor
>
> I see in loaddefs.el:
>
>     (register-definition-prefixes "semantic/bovine/c" '("c-mode" "semantic"))
>
> I think "c-mode" shouldn't be there, but I can't seem to figure out why
> it is.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#57000: Wrong entry "c-mode" in definition prefix for semantic
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 5 Aug 2022 20:27:35 +0200
>
>
>
>
> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>
> > Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> writes:
> >
> >> This is caused by
> >>
> >>     defcustom-mode-local-semantic-dependency-system-include-path
> >>
> >> One possible fix below, but I'm not sure we want to do this generally:
> >
> > The patch just allows a newline after the (def* form?  I think that
> > makes sense.
>
> Yes, indeed.  Now done on master (commit ea6c2e9295).
>
>
> --- End Message ---