emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#57052: closed (elogind-service specifies a variable that's ignored b


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#57052: closed (elogind-service specifies a variable that's ignored by defualt)
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 04:39:02 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:38:34 -0400
with message-id <871qton25x.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#57052: elogind-service specifies a variable that's 
ignored by defualt
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #57052,
regarding elogind-service specifies a variable that's ignored by defualt
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
57052: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=57052
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: elogind-service specifies a variable that's ignored by defualt Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2022 23:29:30 +0000
"HandleLidSwitchExternalPower= is completely ignored by default (for backwards 
compatibility)"[1]

I noticed (with help in IRC) that my laptop wasn't suspending on lid close when 
plugged in and charging, which I hadn't seen happen on other systems. I now 
know that I can set this by configuring the `elogind-service` parameter 
`handle-lid-switch-external-power`. Regardless, it seems like it should default 
to being unset rather than set/ignored, since that would heed the line I quoted 
above.

[1]: https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/logind.conf.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#57052: elogind-service specifies a variable that's ignored by defualt Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:38:34 -0400 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)
Hello,

Cairn <cairn@pm.me> writes:

> Would it not still be explicit if variables that should go unspecified
> were written out, but not given a value? Maybe I'm misunderstanding
> the point of explicit values though.

I made it *unspecified* in 59ee837d8b, given this service config doesn't
yet use 'define-configuration' that would have allowed for a proper
maybe-value.

Tested to work on a X200 and pushed!

Closing, at last.

Thanks,

Maxim


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]