--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Make --pure the default for `guix environment'? |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Dec 2019 16:42:07 +0100 |
--pure seems to be the more sensible behaviour. "Impure" environments
can have unexpected behaviours, so it makes sense to only allow them
when the user explicitly asks for it.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#38529: Make --pure the default for `guix environment'? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Aug 2022 10:28:35 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) |
tags 38529 +wontfix
thanks
Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> writes:
>
>> --pure seems to be the more sensible behaviour. "Impure" environments
>> can have unexpected behaviours, so it makes sense to only allow them
>> when the user explicitly asks for it.
>
> Unfortunately Guix packages often don't work well with --pure. Be it
> magit that depends on git, or Emacs that depend or coreutils, etc.,
> there are many things that are expected to be propagated and aren't
> explicitly, by omission or sometimes for closure's size sake (when the
> feature is optional). We could argue that is a good reason for the
> proposed change :-).
>
> I think environments are great mostly for hacking and trying stuff
> quickly, where the guarantees of Guix do not matter as much as for
> profiles (and if they did, you'd be better with guix environment
> --container anyway).
>
> So, I guess that makes me more on the side of "let's no change the
> defaults for now".
Closing this old forgotten issue as wontfix.
Thanks,
Maxim
--- End Message ---