--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Don't call (vc-find-backend-function backend 'merge) [svn/cvs/rcs] |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Aug 2021 00:08:44 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 |
vc-merge should call (vc-find-backend-function backend 'merge-file) instead.
The change is trivial, but someone with any of the VCS listed above
installed should test it.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#50258: Don't call (vc-find-backend-function backend 'merge) [svn/cvs/rcs] |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Aug 2022 01:16:47 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 |
On 23.08.2022 13:38, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
Maybe testing is not even necessary: the change I'm proposing seems
like a no-brainer, it just removes the requirement for the 'merge'
backend methods to be defined (in per-file backends). No code uses
them directly anyway.
diff --git a/lisp/vc/vc.el b/lisp/vc/vc.el
index d3e53858c1..3274f1ec9d 100644
--- a/lisp/vc/vc.el
+++ b/lisp/vc/vc.el
@@ -2294,7 +2294,7 @@ vc-merge
((vc-find-backend-function backend 'merge-branch)
(vc-call-backend backend 'merge-branch))
;; Otherwise, do a per-file merge.
- ((vc-find-backend-function backend 'merge)
+ ((vc-find-backend-function backend 'merge-file)
(vc-buffer-sync)
(dolist (file files)
(let* ((state (vc-state file))
I think you should just go ahead and push -- if this turns out to be a
problem in svn/cvs/rcs (which seems unlikely), somebody that uses those
will probably file a bug report in a few years.
Makes sense, pushed. Thanks.
--- End Message ---