bug#57469: closed (Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2022 14:36:23 +0300
with message-id <831qszxow8.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#57469: Missing information about all the modes that 
fall under prog-mode.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #57469,
regarding Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
57469: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=57469
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 29 Aug 2022 04:12:33 +0000
>
>
>
>
>
> I am using prog-mode-hook but cannot find anywhere in the manual stating all 
> the modes that fall under prog-mode.
>
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#57469: Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 29 Aug 2022 14:36:23 +0300
>
>
>
>
> > Cc: 57469@debbugs.gnu.org, uzibalqa <uzibalqa@proton.me>
> > From: Christopher Dimech <dimech@gmx.com>
> > Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:29:28 +0200
> > 
> > > > OP does not want examples, but the actual list of language major-modes.
> > > >
> > 
> > Quite a list.  If it is problematic to include in the manual, a built-in lisp 
> > function
> > could be introduced that returns this list.  Would be useful.
>
> Not only is it problematic to include this in the manual, it will also
> be inaccurate in every Emacs session out there, because the above list
> cannot possibly include all the modes in 3rd-party packages out there.
>
> Users who set such settings in the likes of prog-mode should
> understand what they are doing.  If they are unsure which modes this
> will affect, they should do this in mode hooks of specific modes, noit
> in prog-mode.
>
> I'm closing this bug because there's no bug here.
>
>
> --- End Message ---