bug#57505: closed (29.0.50; Is loading seq.el before using it necessary?)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 31 Aug 2022 19:16:28 +0300
with message-id <83o7w0s80z.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#57505: 29.0.50; Is loading seq.el before using it 
necessary?
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #57505,
regarding 29.0.50; Is loading seq.el before using it necessary?
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
57505: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=57505
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 29.0.50; Is loading seq.el before using it necessary?
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:04:35 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> doc/lispref/sequences.texi says this starting in line 448:
>
>     The @file{seq.el} library provides the following additional sequence
>   manipulation macros and functions, prefixed with @code{seq-}.  To use
>   them, you must first load the @file{seq} library.
>
> Is the last sentence (still?) true?  I'm not really familiar with Emacs'
> startup process, but seq.el seems to be preloaded, so require'ing it
> isn't necessary.  Or am I missing something?
>
> Best, Arash
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#57505: 29.0.50; Is loading seq.el before using it necessary?
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 31 Aug 2022 19:16:28 +0300
>
>
>
>
> > From: Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org>
> > Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:04:35 +0200
> > 
> >     The @file{seq.el} library provides the following additional sequence
> >   manipulation macros and functions, prefixed with @code{seq-}.  To use
> >   them, you must first load the @file{seq} library.
> > 
> > Is the last sentence (still?) true?  I'm not really familiar with Emacs'
> > startup process, but seq.el seems to be preloaded, so require'ing it
> > isn't necessary.  Or am I missing something?
>
> Thanks, fixed.
>
>
> --- End Message ---