[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (type graphic)

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: (type graphic)
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 15:37:25 +0900 (JST)

"Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:
> Yes, but is it actually that much better than the 'graphic thing that
> you already committed?

It would help greatly in specific cases, and a general implementation is
not much harder than supporting those cases.

For instance, support of underline on terminals is widespread, but still
nowhere near universal (e.g., xterm supports it but the linux console
does not).  Underlining is important enough that it ought to be used
where it's available, and without requiring faces to be artificially
baroque simply to ensure that they aren't nops.

Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra.  Suddenly it flips over,
pinning you underneath.  At night the ice weasels come.  --Nietzsche

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]