[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lexical mumblings
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: lexical mumblings |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Oct 2001 15:12:13 -0400 |
> There are several possible ways -- for instance, a special `llet' form,
> if you just want to use lexical binding for particular cases [maybe in a
> speed critical inner loop], or perhaps putting `(use-lexical-binding)'
> at the top-level of an elisp source file, which would cause
> byte-compiler to lexically bind local variables instead of using the
> normal dynamic binding.
`llet' is fine, but (use-lexical-binding) is more tricky because the
code should also work with the interpreter which can't easily keep track
of whether a piece of code came from a file that said (use-lexical-binding).
Stefan
- Re: lexical mumblings, (continued)
- Re: lexical mumblings, Andrew Innes, 2001/10/19
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/19
- Re: lexical mumblings, Kai Großjohann, 2001/10/19
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/19
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/21
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/24
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/25
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/25
- Re: lexical mumblings,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/26
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/27
- Re: lexical mumblings, Andrew Innes, 2001/10/29
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/29
- Re: lexical mumblings, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Stefan Monnier, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Andrew Innes, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/31