[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *scratch* considered harmful
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: *scratch* considered harmful |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:40:35 +0200 (IST) |
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Dhruva Krishnamurthy wrote:
> In the 21.1.50 build, I find the initial buffer is named "*temp*"
> (with info and welcome message) and not the "*scratch*" buffer that
> I see in 21.1 release build. Is it intentional or is there some other goal ?
Is it "*temp*" or " *temp*" (with the leading blank)?
If the latter, it normally means Emacs found some problem during startup.
In any case, today's CVS has startup.el which still creates *scratch*,
not *temp*.
- *scratch* considered harmful, Per Starback, 2001/11/14
- Re: *scratch* considered harmful, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/15
- Re: *scratch* considered harmful, Dhruva Krishnamurthy, 2001/11/15
- Re: *scratch* considered harmful,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: *scratch* considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/15
- Re: *scratch* considered harmful, Dhruva Krishnamurthy, 2001/11/19
- Re: *scratch* considered harmful, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/19
- Re: *scratch* considered harmful, Jason Rumney, 2001/11/19
- Re: *scratch* considered harmful, Jason Rumney, 2001/11/20
- Re: *scratch* considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/20
- Re: *scratch* considered harmful, Jason Rumney, 2001/11/22
- Re: *scratch* considered harmful, Dhruva Krishnamurthy, 2001/11/22
- Re: *scratch* considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/24
- Re: *scratch* considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/23