|
From: | Miles Bader |
Subject: | Re: URL syntax (was: Re: Tramp, "[]" in file names, and file-expand-wildcards) |
Date: | 30 Nov 2001 10:51:57 +0900 |
"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> writes: > But I don't think that the current way substitute-in-file-name > checks for file-name-handlers is enough since the url file-name-handler > will simply not be called on file names like "/foo/http://blabla". > > The substitute-in-file-name command has special support to recognize > "/foo/a:/bar" under W32 and MS-DOS, but we need to make it more generic. Is there any reason not to have substitute-in-file-name _always_ look for appropriate file-name handers? I don't think it's called all that often, so speed probably isn't a real concern here. -miles -- [|nurgle|] ddt- demonic? so quake will have an evil kinda setting? one that will make every christian in the world foamm at the mouth? [iddt] nurg, that's the goal
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |