Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.

[Juanma Barranquero]

On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 08:21:17 +0300 (IDT), Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:

> That is, what modules are present in the list submitted to make-docfile on 
> each 
> platform, and which explain these differences?

See the list below.

> the question is whether all platforms should have the doc strings of those.

That seems like a good idea, but it'll pose a maintenance burden, I
think.

> Then there are some x-* symbols which I thought should be in all 
> versions.

All x-files have a corresponding w32-file, but I suppose they don't
always define the exact same symbols.

> And then there are some symbols like ucs-* and others which should have 
> been in DOC on all systems--can you see why they aren't?

Don't know why the relevant files (like lisp/international/ucs-tables)
aren't included. An oversight, perhaps?

                                                           /L/e/k/t/u



--- redhat.lst  Thu Jun 13 11:49:53 2002
+++ windows.lst Thu Jun 13 11:49:40 2002
-src/atimer
+src/alloca
-src/composite
-src/dosfns
+src/gmalloc
+src/lastfile
-src/mac
-src/macfns
-src/macmenu
-src/macterm
-src/md5
-src/msdos
+src/ralloc
-src/sound
-src/sunfns
+src/termcap
+src/tparam
-src/unexelf
+src/unexw32
+src/vm-limit
+src/w32
+src/w32console
+src/w32fns
+src/w32heap
+src/w32inevt
+src/w32menu
+src/w32proc
+src/w32reg
+src/w32select
+src/w32term
+src/w32xfns
-src/xfns
-src/xmenu
-src/xrdb
-src/xselect
-src/xsmfns
-src/xterm
-lisp/font-core
-lisp/international/ucs-tables
+lisp/w32-vars