[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No calc in pretest?
From: |
Jon Cast |
Subject: |
Re: No calc in pretest? |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Jul 2002 16:22:10 -0500 |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) wrote:
> Jon Cast <address@hidden> writes:
> > We could also call the development snapshots 21.4.50, 21.4.51,
> > etc. Even better would be 21.4.50.yyyymmdd, IMO (also, yyyymmdd
> > makes it abundantly clear it's a snapshot, even to people who
> > don't understand the Linux numbering scheme.)
> I like this idea!
> But I think we should number snapshots -- including pretests -- as
> 21.5.0.yyyymmdd
> Then the major and minor number for the pretest and snapshots
> would be the same as for the actual release.
> The current scheme suffers from the problem that the minor
> number is off by one...
Again, I'm a strong believer in lexicographic ordering.
21.5.0.yyyymmdd sorts higher than 21.5.0, so it should be a later
release.
> --
> Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: No calc in pretest?, (continued)
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Robert J. Chassell, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?,
Jon Cast <=
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/03
Re: No calc in pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/02
Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02