[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reducing defface redundancy
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: reducing defface redundancy |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:01:22 -0400 |
> If we have buffer-specific face attributes, or buffer-specific face
> redirections, you could use them to give the minibuffer different faces.
How would we do that ? As part of the creation of the " *minibuffer-N*"
buffers ? What about the echo area ?
> Do you ever create a minibuffer window that is part of a larger frame?
No.
> If you do, would you be unhappy if the special face
> definitions that you use for the minibuffer were effective there too?
No.
Stefan
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/07/03
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Kai Großjohann, 2002/07/03
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/03
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/08
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/07/08
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/09
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/09
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/09
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/10
- Re: reducing defface redundancy,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/07/11
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/12