[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Carsten Dominik <address@hidden>] Re: lisp/ChangeLog corruption

From: Steve Youngs
Subject: Re: [Carsten Dominik <address@hidden>] Re: lisp/ChangeLog corruption
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 03:01:14 +1000
User-agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) XEmacs/21.5 (broccoli, i686-pc-linux)

|--==> "RS" == Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> wrote:

  > I have been using XEmacs 21.1 patch 14 (Mule) to check edit and check
  > in the file.  I don't know why it would change the coding system, but
  > maybe it does.  I don't know much about coding systems...

Carsten, this might help (untested):

(if (featurep 'mule)
      (define-coding-system-alias 'iso-2022-7bit-unix 'iso-2022-7bit)
      (add-to-list 'file-coding-system-alist '("ChangeLog" . 

  RS> Please don't do this with XEmacs any more.  Please use Emacs.

Why?  Providing that the above prevents any future file corruption in
the ChangeLogs, it shouldn't matter should it?

  RS> (Besides, the only way you can test your changes in Emacs is to use
  RS> Emacs.)

True, but it's not often that you need to test changes to a ChangeLog
file. :-)

|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---|
|            XEmacs - It's not just an editor.             |
|                    It's a way of life.                   |

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]