[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *Occur in buf*?
From: |
Robert J. Chassell |
Subject: |
Re: *Occur in buf*? |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jul 2002 18:46:05 +0000 (UTC) |
But, I'm not sure how clean the Occur buffer key (to rename the *Occur*
buffer to *Occur: buf*) would actually be.
My preference would be to see the Occur command create a buffer named
*Occur: buf*
If I run the occur command again in the same buffer, then it should
reuse the *Occur: buf* buffer.
However, if I run the occur command in a different buffer, then then
it should create a new and different *Occur: different_buf* buffer.
Also, this means that the buffer created by `multi-occur' can continue
to be named *Occur* without a name collision.
--
Robert J. Chassell address@hidden
Rattlesnake Enterprises http://www.rattlesnake.com
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, (continued)
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Benjamin Rutt, 2002/07/26
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/27
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/27
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/29
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Sam Steingold, 2002/07/30
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/30
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/31
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Sam Steingold, 2002/07/31
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/28
RE: *Occur in buf*?, Marshall, Simon, 2002/07/25
- Re: *Occur in buf*?,
Robert J. Chassell <=
RE: *Occur in buf*?, Marshall, Simon, 2002/07/29