[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regex and case-fold-search problem
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: regex and case-fold-search problem |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Sep 2002 12:58:40 -0400 |
> > > It is wrong even for ASCII
> > Do you have any evidence to support that claim ?
> > You yourself said it would match characters which
> > were not case-equivalent to something in the originally specified range.
>
> When was it ? I'd guess that was before I installed my patch.
>
> src/ChangeLog does not list any recent changes in regex.c.
> Did you install a change and fail to put it in ChangeLog?
2002-08-23 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
* regex.c (PATFETCH): Remove the translating fetch.
(PATFETCH_RAW): Rename to PATFETCH.
(set_image_of_range): New fun.
(SET_RANGE_TABLE_WORK_AREA): Use it.
(regex_compile): Don't translate the pattern chars so eagerly.
Only do it when inserting an `exactn' bytecode or when handling
a char-range.
(mutually_exclusive_p): Avoid empty statement.
> Anyway, the change you sent seemed to have the problem of including
> excess characters in ASCII ranges.
No, only in non-ASCII chars. The excess is introduced in set_image_of_range
which is only used for non-ASCII chars.
Stefan
- Re: regex and case-fold-search problem, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/01
- Re: regex and case-fold-search problem, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/01
- Re: regex and case-fold-search problem, Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/01
- Re: regex and case-fold-search problem, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/02
- Re: regex and case-fold-search problem,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: regex and case-fold-search problem, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/04
- Re: regex and case-fold-search problem, Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/04
- Re: regex and case-fold-search problem, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/05
- re-search-forward seems to be broken, Miles Bader, 2002/09/05
- Re: re-search-forward seems to be broken, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/06