Re: INFO on add-ons

[David A. Cobb]

Richard Stallman wrote:

>    Would nearly everyone agree that folks who provide/maintain packages or 
>    FSF Emacs
>
> Please don't call our program "FSF Emacs".  That term was
> coined by XEmacs developers and it is subtly a put-down.
Absolutely no put-down or negative conotation was intended.  To anyone 
whose toes feel bruised I sincerely apologise.

> I don't think all Emacs packages need their own manuals.
> Only some of them need manuals.
No, not manuals.  But 1 - 5 Info pages for the user would be nice.

And some things do deserve a full-up users' manual.

By now there is far, far more in (X)Emacs than /any/ user is likely to 
have on the top of her head.

> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
>
>  

--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way 
of a Pilgrim; R. M. French, tr.
Life is too short to tolerate crappy software.
.