[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Sep 2002 00:01:46 -0400 |
In other words, running `diff' on
the original and the edited files will not show any changes in those line
you didn't modify. However, unification means that `diff' _will_
sometimes show differences in unedited portions of the file, because C2
was recoded into a different codepoint.
Given that we are using unicode and unification,
isn't this inevitable?
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Kenichi Handa, 2002/09/03
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/04
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Kenichi Handa, 2002/09/05
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/05
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Kenichi Handa, 2002/09/06
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/06
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Dave Love, 2002/09/09
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/19
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Dave Love, 2002/09/25
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/19
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/19
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Dave Love, 2002/09/25
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Kenichi Handa, 2002/09/06
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Dave Love, 2002/09/05