[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Sep 2002 12:47:53 +0200 |
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 07:08:09 +0200 (IST), Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> How about if you invoke command.com explicitly, like this:
>
> command.com /c for .... >>foo.txt
I couldn't make it work, it didn't write any directory to subdirs.el.
> If it does the job, there's nothing ugly about it.
BTW, would it be OK to install some of the lisp/makefile.w32-in changes
into 21_1_RC? That way the update-subdirs target would at least work in
NT/2K/XP platforms. (And the WINS/WINS_WITHOUT_TERM hack can be
installed if necessary to make it work also in 95/98/Me.)
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, (continued)
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/01
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/04
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Andreas Schwab, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/18
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/20
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/20
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/22
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/22
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/24
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/24
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/25
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/25
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/30