[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions.
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions. |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Sep 2002 19:05:51 -0500 (CDT) |
>From my previuos message:
Instead I would like it to look like this (all macro-written code):
(defun my-mode ()
...
(if argument1 (action1 argument1) (default-action1))
.......
or similar.
"it" referring to the expansion of the macro. Of course, a better
alternative would be to have the expansion depend on the argument. I
was forgetting that we are talking about a macro.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., (continued)
Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Luc Teirlinck, 2002/09/03
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/04
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Luc Teirlinck, 2002/09/04
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/06
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., David Masterson, 2002/09/06
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Luc Teirlinck, 2002/09/06
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions.,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Luc Teirlinck, 2002/09/06
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Luc Teirlinck, 2002/09/06
Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Richard Stallman, 2002/09/03