[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Sep 2002 23:16:53 -0400 |
> I also have a hard time seeing why the most local abbrev table would
> be such an obvious default for C-x a (i) l.
I think that's the current behavior, isn't it?
There is no "current behavior" for this question. The question never
arises at present. There is only one local abbrev table for a major
mode, and C-x a l uses that one.
- Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode, (continued)
- Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/09
- Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode, Kai Großjohann, 2002/09/05
- Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode, Miles Bader, 2002/09/05
- Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2002/09/05
- Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode, Miles Bader, 2002/09/05
- Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2002/09/05
- Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode, Miles Bader, 2002/09/05
- Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode, Kai Großjohann, 2002/09/06
- Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/06
- Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/06
Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/04
Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/03