[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: Poor performance over DSL link]
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: Poor performance over DSL link] |
Date: |
12 Sep 2002 10:20:38 +0900 |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> So that very trivial change would not suffice; a function based
> interface to turn XIM off or on is needed
It could still use a variable as the user-interface, if that's better.
[e.g., in an appropriate place, do `if (xim_enabled != last_xim_enabled)...']
> making the changes somewhat less trivial.
Indeed...
-Miles
--
`The suburb is an obsolete and contradictory form of human settlement'
- Re: address@hidden: Poor performance over DSL link], (continued)
- Re: address@hidden: Poor performance over DSL link], Richard Stallman, 2002/09/11
- Re: address@hidden: Poor performance over DSL link], Kim F. Storm, 2002/09/11
- Re: address@hidden: Poor performance over DSL link], Richard Stallman, 2002/09/12
- Re: address@hidden: Poor performance over DSL link], Richard Stallman, 2002/09/12
- Message not available
- Re: address@hidden: Poor performance over DSL link], Richard Stallman, 2002/09/14
- Message not available
- Re: address@hidden: Poor performance over DSL link], Richard Stallman, 2002/09/10
- Re: address@hidden: Poor performance over DSL link], Gerd Moellmann, 2002/09/11
Re: address@hidden: Poor performance over DSL link], Richard Stallman, 2002/09/09
Re: address@hidden: Poor performance over DSL link], Richard Stallman, 2002/09/11