[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A few questions about occur-mode
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: A few questions about occur-mode |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Sep 2002 14:32:35 -0300 |
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 15:39:38 -0400
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> For now, please don't.
Ok. Still, it´d be useful to give it some though as you suggest.
> If we do this, we should do it in all of those modes. This too calls for
> more though and study.
Ok. My .emacs for now, then.
> No particular reason.
Wouldn´t then be logical to rename them? AFAIK, user functions for a
mode FOO are usually FOO-func1, FOO-func2, not FOO-mode-func1,
FOO-mode-func2. I don´t think changing them would cause trouble, as
users are probably using them throug bindings in occur-mode and not
directly with M-x.
> I don't remember anything about that.
Any idea, anyone?
Thanks,
--
Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
- A few questions about occur-mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/20
- Re: A few questions about occur-mode, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/21
- Re: A few questions about occur-mode,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: A few questions about occur-mode, John Paul Wallington, 2002/09/22
- Re: A few questions about occur-mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/23
- Re: A few questions about occur-mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/23
- Re: A few questions about occur-mode, John Paul Wallington, 2002/09/23
- Re: A few questions about occur-mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/24
- Re: A few questions about occur-mode, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/23
- Re: A few questions about occur-mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/24
- Re: A few questions about occur-mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/24
- Re: A few questions about occur-mode, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/24
- Re: A few questions about occur-mode, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/24