Re: M-x compile for different file extensions

[Ehud Karni]

On Sun, 20 Oct 2002 15:52:49 -0400, Stefan Monnier <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> 
wrote:
> 
> >     4. An easy way to interact (send input to) with the compilation process
> >        (`compile-send-to-process').
> > 
> > This indeed is something important.
> > 
> > It is sort of unfortunate that we have the conflict between two
> > meanings we would like RET to have in the compilation buffer: "visit
> > the source code for a particular error message", and "send a line of
> > input".  We have used it for the former ever since that convention
> > existed in Emacs (several years ago), but would it be better to use
> > it for the latter instead?
> 
> We could probably let RET do something like
> (if (eobp) (send-to-process) (goto-error))

That may work, but please note that there 2 functions - 1 sends the
string with terminating new line, the other sends without the NL.

Ehud.


-- 
 Ehud Karni           Tel: +972-3-7966-561  /"\
 Mivtach - Simon      Fax: +972-3-7966-667  \ /  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
 Insurance agencies   (USA) voice mail and   X   Against   HTML   Mail
 http://www.mvs.co.il  FAX:  1-815-5509341  / \
 mailto:address@hidden                  Better  Safe  Than  Sorry