Re: while-no-input

[Kim F. Storm]

"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> writes:

> > However, it would cleaner if instead of generating a quit signal it
> > did a throw to a specified tag.
> 
> The reason I didn't do that is that it didn't seem necessary
> and that I didn't want the QUIT macro to grow, but I could introduce
> a new function `quit' that the QUIT macro could call and which would
> either call `Fsignal (Qquit, Qnil)' ot `Fthrow (...)'.

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> That would be ok.

Stefan,

What happened with this feature?

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk