Re: Bug in shell.el: explicit-bash-args does not work for bash 1.x

[Kai Großjohann]

address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:

> Maybe we could have explicit-SHELL-args-2 which is an alternate
> set of args to use in case the shell fails to start with the
> args provided in explicit-SHELL-args.

Yes, or explicit-SHELL-args could be a vector of lists of strings if
multiple tries are necessary.

kai
-- 
~/.signature is: umop ap!sdn    (Frank Nobis)