[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1 |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Jan 2003 20:25:07 +0100 |
> No, it is not Docbook, it uses `linuxdoc' (no idea what that is).
> To quote the first page I found about this format:
This is not true. Perhaps older versions used linuxdoc (gtk is
notoriously bad for leaving old documentation lying around where
people can find it), but the GNOME and GTK projects have
standardized on docbook.
Then I had to be looking at some old copy.
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, (continued)
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/02
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/02
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/01/03
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/03
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/01/04
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Alex Schroeder, 2003/01/04
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Raja R Harinath, 2003/01/04
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Eric Gillespie, 2003/01/04
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/03
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/03
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/03
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/03
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/04
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Jan D., 2003/01/04
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/04
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Jan D., 2003/01/04
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/04
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/04