[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1 |
Date: |
05 Jan 2003 17:00:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
"Robert J. Chassell" <address@hidden> writes:
> > Yes. If it is not on your machine, you may not be able to access it:
>
> Well if it is not on your machine -- you definitely cannot access it
> without accessing the Internet.
>
> That is false! I do not access over the Internet most of the material
> that is not on my machine. You must be living in a rich and different
> world! Mostly, I get software and documentation from CDs. It would
> take me over 500 hours to download the Debian CDs that I use.
The basic statement is not false! If the document is not on your
machine, you cannot access it locally. If I have to choose between
swapping CDs or visiting a URL, I'd choose the URL. But if the file
you need is on a CD of yours, why didn't you install it locally in the
first place?
I'm arguing about files which ARE NOT AVAILABLE LOCALLY.
What's wrong about specifying a URL where you can access it?
As a user, you are free(!) to follow or ignore the URL.
> We must rely on `having a local file', meaning a file that is a part
> of a standard distribution, and either on a user's machine, or less
> conveniently, on a CD or other inexpensive transport media.
I fully agree that having an local, well-written info file is much
better than having to rely on a remote HTML or PDF document.
But in my experience, you cannot rely on any specific documentation to
be available locally -- unless you include that documentation as part
of your own software distribution -- and even in that case, there's no
guarantee that whoever puts your software into a distribution will
also include the docs....
>
> This means that we must continue to write documentation and provide it
> to the user.
>
Exactly! The real issue is to write the necessary documentation and
include it in the emacs distribution.
Until that's done, I don't see what's wrong with supplying a URL
where you can find the "best docs currently available" .
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, (continued)
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/07
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Alex Schroeder, 2003/01/07
- Texinfo/info: scrolling images (Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1), Karl Eichwalder, 2003/01/04
- Re: Texinfo/info: scrolling images (Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1), Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/11
- Re: Texinfo/info: scrolling images (Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1), Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/11
- Re: Texinfo/info: scrolling images (Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1), Karl Eichwalder, 2003/01/12
- Re: Texinfo/info: scrolling images (Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1), Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/12
- Re: Texinfo/info: scrolling images, Karl Eichwalder, 2003/01/13
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/04
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/05
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/01/05
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/05
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/05
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Eric Gillespie, 2003/01/04
Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/02
Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/02