[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available |
Date: |
18 Jan 2003 02:28:01 +0000 |
address@hidden (Kevin A. Burton (burtonator)) writes:
> Nic Ferrier <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > address@hidden (Kevin A. Burton (burtonator)) writes:
> >
> > > Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> > >
> > > > I would bet good money that Xalan will not compile on GCJ. It might
> > > > require some modifications to get working. I wanted to spend some
> > > > time
> > > > documenting the difference between GCJ and JDK 1.4 and will do that
> > > > in a
> > > > month or so when I port over NewsMonster.
> > > >
> > > > Is anyone interested in trying Xalan in GCJ and seeing if it does work?
> > > >
> > > > We can't consider XSLT-process as a legitimate part of the free
> > > > software world
> > > > if it needs JDK to run. Fixing this ought to be the highest priority.
> > >
> > > Give me a little time... it is on my list of things to do but I need
> > > about 3-4
> > > weeks to get around to it.
> > >
> > > Getting Xalan working on GCJ and a Free Software environment is of high
> > > priority
> > > for me too. Very high priority...
> >
> > Out of interest: Why aren't you just using libxml/libxslt from the GNU
> > project?
> <snip/>
>
> A number of reasons... Xalan and Xerces are literally the best XML/XSLT impls
> I
> have ever played with. They also support an advanced plugin/extension API
> and I
> can do really amazing things with them under Java.
>
> As is the case Java is not Free Software which makes the situation bad. For a
> while there I was taking a balanced approach (this was a decision I made 5
> years
> ago btw) and I think it is the perfect example of why people should NEVER use
> non-free software.
>
> My current goals are to move go GCJ and encourage SUN to do the right thing
> when
> it comes to Java and make it Free Software.
>
> This is a *big* move for me as I have use a lot of the libraries under Jakarta
> (I used to be a fulltime developer there) and a lot of them require code from
> the standard JDK.
>
> Of course part of my migration to GCJ is going to be working on the stdlib so
> that I can compile complex appls like Xalan on GCJ.
Remember that GNU has the ClasspathX project which has the GNU-JAXP
implementation. We don't yet have XSLT but I plan to write a GNU-JAXP
wrapper (assuming GCJ) for libxslt.
Nic
- [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Ovidiu Predescu, 2003/01/08
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/09
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Ovidiu Predescu, 2003/01/09
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Kevin A. Burton (burtonator), 2003/01/15
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/17
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Kevin A. Burton (burtonator), 2003/01/17
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Nic Ferrier, 2003/01/17
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Kevin A. Burton (burtonator), 2003/01/17
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available,
Nic Ferrier <=
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Kevin A. Burton (burtonator), 2003/01/18
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Ovidiu Predescu, 2003/01/17
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/18
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Ovidiu Predescu, 2003/01/19
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/19
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, md5i, 2003/01/20
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Ovidiu Predescu, 2003/01/20
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Jason Rumney, 2003/01/20
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/21
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.2 available, Kevin A. Burton (burtonator), 2003/01/23