[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28 |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:18:26 -0500 |
If we want a multibyte sequence but each character contained
is one of ascii, eight-bit-control, and eight-bit-graphic
corresponding to the original bytes, we must read by
no-conversion, and insert characters one by one as below:
(apply 'insert (string-to-list UNIBYTE-STRING))
Perhaps, we must have a function, say, string-to-multibyte,
and make this enable.
(insert (string-to-multibyte UNIBYTE-STRING))
I think we do need this function string-to-multibyte, and its doc
string should carefully explain how it differs from
string-make-multibyte.
I don't remember why the current code does as above. I
think the behaviour what Eli wrote is more consistent with
the behaviour of file reading.
Shall I change the code as what Eli wrote (by introducing
the new function string-to-multibyte)?
Please do introduce string-to-multibyte. What other change do
you propose? I am not sure how what Eli wrote differs from the
current behavior.
By the way, it may be clean to have all these functions in
parallel, and spare one section describing the difference of
MAKE, AS, TO conversions in info.
string-make-multibyte
string-as-multibyte
string-to-multibyte
These three are all useful.
string-make-unibyte
string-as-unibyte
string-to-unibyte (perpaps the same as string-as-unibyte, or
it should signal an error if non-ascii,
non-eight-bit-XXX is contained).
I don't see a need to add string-to-unibyte.
buffer-make-multibyte
buffer-as-multibyte (same as (set-buffer-multibyte BUFFER t))
buffer-to-multibyte
I don't think buffer-make-multibyte and buffer-to-multibyte are
useful. What is useful is to have functions to operate on a region in
a multibyte buffer, transforming the text between these three
different representations. (Some of the 6 transformations may be
meaningless or impossible; we should only support the meaningful
ones.)
buffer-make-unibyte
buffer-as-unibyte (same as (set-buffer-multibyte BUFFER nil))
buffer-to-nuibyte
I don't think any change here is worth making.
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], (continued)
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Miles Bader, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Richard Stallman, 2003/01/22
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Richard Stallman, 2003/01/22
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/22
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28, Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/19
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/21