[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 03:00:09 -0500 |
(It seems to me that the basic problem is that the environment string
is exposed to Lisp, presumably because it predates multilingual
issues, and really shouldn't be. I think accessing it directly should
be deprecated.)
The general idea of Emacs is to expose data structure to the Lisp
program whenever possible. I see no reason to go against that here.
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, (continued)
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/26
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/26
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Dave Love, 2003/01/28
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Dave Love, 2003/01/28
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Dave Love, 2003/01/27
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Dave Love, 2003/01/26
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Dave Love, 2003/01/21
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/24
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/25
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/26
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/26
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/27
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/26
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Dave Love, 2003/01/26