[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jan 2003 10:36:54 -0500 |
I agree. Text strings exposed to Lisp programs should be in the
internal representation, i.e. decoded. Otherwise, Lisp programs would
be unable to easily use them in text-processing context.
This would be true ordinarily, but here there is a more important
factor. The usual thing to do with environment variables is to pass
them through. Making sure that is solidly reliable is the highest
priority for environment variables. Therefore we have to leave these
strings in their original format.
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Dave Love, 2003/01/21
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/23
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/24
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/25
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/26
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/27
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/26
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Dave Love, 2003/01/26