[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: info
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: info |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jan 2003 22:02:22 +0200 |
> From: address@hidden (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 09:39:13 +0100
>
> First of all, if point is on a menu line, then choose that menu
> item. That much we all agree on.
Doesn't Emacs do that now? I thought it did.
> Further, if point is on a line starting with whitespace and
> containing some non-whitespace text, this could be a continuation
> line for a menu line.
I think this should be removed and instead Emacs should not go
anywhere in those cases. Several examples in this thread show how
such ad-hoc algorithms can fail miserably. Can you explain why do you
think this behavior is better than what the stand-alone reader does?
Re: info, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/29
Re: info, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/29
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/29
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/29
- Re: info, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Kai Großjohann, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/30
- Re: info,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: info, Kai Großjohann, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/31
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/31
- Re: info, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/31
Re: info, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/29