[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ?\_ patch
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: ?\_ patch |
Date: |
07 Feb 2003 17:07:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Dmitry Paduchikh <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi!
>
> >>>>> Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Morever, `#' is _good_ becaues it's the general lisp syntax for special
> > syntax, so a lisp programmer will be much more likely to realize what's
> > going
> > on (if he's unfamiliar with this particular bit of syntax) if he sees #\SPC
> > than if he sees ?SPC.
>
> If you will do this, why not introduce such alternative syntax for
> _all_ characters? It would give the advantage of being consistent with
> other lispish languages since both CL and Scheme use `#\' to denote
> characters.
What is the CL and Scheme syntax for a space character ?
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: ?\_ patch, (continued)
- Re: ?\_ patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kenichi Handa, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Dmitry Paduchikh, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: ?\_ patch, John Paul Wallington, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, John Paul Wallington, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/08
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/09
- Re: ?\_ patch, Dmitry Paduchikh, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Damien Elmes, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/07