[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scrollbar (once more)
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: scrollbar (once more) |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Apr 2003 09:51:13 -0500 |
> Richard Stallman wrote:
>
> The thumb now covers nearly the entire length of the scrollbar,
> because the inaccessible portion all of a sudden starts "counting".
>
> I'd call it a bug. Could you try to figure out what causes it?
>
> Somehow, with the narrowed buffer completely out of view above the
> window and point just after the final newline, the computation of the
> thumb length seems to count the entire inaccessible portion after point
> as "present" in the window. Apparently, (- (buffer-size) (point))
> characters get counted as present in the window.
>
> Does the thumb size of the (native) scrollbar get adjusted in the Lisp
> or in the C code? At first view, I have the impression that it is in
> the C code. (Although I am not sure.) While I know C, I am not
> really familiar with Emacs' C code and while I intend to sooner or
> later familiarize myself with it, I do not have the time to start
> studying it at present.
It's in set_vertical_scroll_bar (which I just created a few days ago
by extracting the code out of redisplay_window).
Stefan
- scrollbar (once more), Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/02
- Re: scrollbar (once more), Robert J. Chassell, 2003/04/03
- Re: scrollbar (once more), Richard Stallman, 2003/04/04
- Re: scrollbar (once more), Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/03
- Re: scrollbar (once more),
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: scrollbar (once more), Richard Stallman, 2003/04/05
- Re: scrollbar (once more), Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/06
- Re: scrollbar (once more), Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/06
- Re: scrollbar (once more), Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/06
- Re: scrollbar (once more), Richard Stallman, 2003/04/14
- Re: scrollbar (once more), Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/14
- Re: scrollbar (once more), Richard Stallman, 2003/04/04
- Re: scrollbar (once more), Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/04
- bug in window-end, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/04
- Re: bug in window-end, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/04