[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \225 and so on
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: \225 and so on |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 20:39:31 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
> Currently, \222, \223, \224 are registered in
> latin-extra-code-table. We can add \225 to it. And, by
> paying attention to latin-extra-code-table in
> find-coding-systems-region-internal, we can make Emacs to
> work as you wish. I'll work on it soon.
I've just installed it. Now iso-latin-1 can read/write a
file that contains \225.
> In article <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>> It should be treated as Latin-1, or perhaps as Latin-whatever based on
>> one's usual coding system preferences.
Currently, only iso-latin-1/8/9 has t for
accept-latin-extra-code flag. So, only they can read/write
such a file. I don't know why iso-latin-2/3/4/5 doesn't.
Perhaps, those who uses those coding systems won't encounter
such bytes (\222..\225) that much and they prefer reading
such a file in raw-text. I'm not sure. At least, I don't
rember any complaints about the current definition of those
coding systems.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- \225 and so on, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/07
- Re: \225 and so on, Andreas Schwab, 2003/04/07
- Re: \225 and so on, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/07
- Re: \225 and so on, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/08
- Re: \225 and so on, Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/08
- Re: \225 and so on, Alex Schroeder, 2003/04/09
- Re: \225 and so on, Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/09
- Re: \225 and so on, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/10
Re: \225 and so on, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2003/04/07