[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs developer preferences with respect to emacs binary packages.
From: |
Robert J. Chassell |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs developer preferences with respect to emacs binary packages. |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 22:26:27 +0000 (UTC) |
... and I wanted see if you have any preferences with respect to
which toolkit is built as the default. I'll take any preferences
you might have in consideration ....
As far as I know, the GTK toolkit is still misleading as to the size
of the visible buffer since it does not yet offer underscrolling. The
display includes post-buffer empty space as if it were within-buffer
whitespace; the GTK toolkit still provides a broken user interface.
So you need to use the native toolkit.
Separate issue: which window managers do most Debian users use? Do
some portion of them use KDE or Enlightenment or FVWM? Would they be
pleased with a GTK toolkit that worked right? Should you offer
anything for these users and if so what?
--
Robert J. Chassell Rattlesnake Enterprises
http://www.rattlesnake.com GnuPG Key ID: 004B4AC8
http://www.teak.cc address@hidden