|
From: | Kenichi Handa |
Subject: | Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc. |
Date: | Thu, 10 Apr 2003 09:11:16 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: | SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes: > I would like to fix such discrepancies as follows: > Things measured in columns/lines are named as _CANON_WIDTH and > _CANON_HEIGHT resp., while things measured in pixels are named as > _PIXEL_WIDTH and _PIXEL_HEIGHT resp. How about _WIDTH vs _PIXEL_WIDTH instead of _CANON_WIDTH vs _PIXEL_WIDTH? Doesn't it make the required change smaller? Lisp APIs have that convention (e.g. frame-width vs frame-pixel-width). --- Ken'ichi HANDA address@hidden
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |