[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:45:56 -0400 |
> Couldn't you get the same result with the old code
> by writing @ _?
Here is a patch to add - as an alternate skeleton character. - operates
exactly as _ in setting skeleton-point, but does not interact with the
region wrapping effects.
I don't want to say this is a bad idea, but before we consider it,
could you possibly tell me the answer to my question? Is @ in the new
behavior equivalent to @ _ with the old behavior of @? If not, could
someone tell me why not?
Perhaps the "region wrapping effects" make them different--if so, that
might explain how your answer relates to my question--but I don't know
if that is true.
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, (continued)
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/13
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/20
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/22
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/22
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/23
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/24
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/25
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/28
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/29
Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/02