[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:41:53 +0300 |
> From: David Abrahams <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:21:45 -0400
> >
> > Another relevant piece of information is whether the Windows build of
> > XEmacs is a native build or a Cygwin build.
>
> I see roughly the same snappiness from IMAP with either build of XEmacs.
Then it probably isn't due to subprocess code, that is, I imagine,
very different in the two builds of XEmacs.
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, (continued)
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Jason Rumney, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Jason Rumney, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Ben Wing, 2003/04/25
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Jason Rumney, 2003/04/22
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Frank Schmitt, 2003/04/22