[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question) |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:59:06 -0400 |
As mentioned, in my view of the world, they all have a parent.
But this aside, we can also make the PARENT argument optional
(since it's always a symbol and the next arg (the mode's name) is
always a string).
Ok.
- Re: run-mode-hooks, Richard Stallman, 2003/07/16
- Emacs design question (was: run-mode-hooks), Kai Großjohann, 2003/07/16
- Re: Emacs design question (was: run-mode-hooks), Richard Stallman, 2003/07/20
- define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Stefan Monnier, 2003/07/21
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Miles Bader, 2003/07/22
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Richard Stallman, 2003/07/23
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Miles Bader, 2003/07/23
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Stefan Monnier, 2003/07/23
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Miles Bader, 2003/07/23
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Richard Stallman, 2003/07/25
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Richard Stallman, 2003/07/24
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Richard Stallman, 2003/07/22