[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fixing the lisp/loaddefs.el situation

From: Frank Schmitt
Subject: Re: Fixing the lisp/loaddefs.el situation
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 08:29:02 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt)

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> I've fixed this by renaming `loaddefs.el' to `loaddefs-boot.el', and
> changing lisp/Makefile.in to copy the former from the latter when
> necessary (basically during bootstrap-clean, only if there's no existing
> loaddefs.el, and no emacs binary to build it with).*
> Does anyone have any objection to this change?

I think this is an excellent idea, I hate it to have dozens of
#loaddefs.el.xxx files in my lisp folder resulting from conflicts when

Just one question: Will a simple "make" be enough to ensure that new
autoloads are recognized when building?

Did you ever realize how much text fits in eighty columns? If you now consider
that a signature usually consists of up to four lines, this gives you enough
space to spread a tremendous amount of information with your messages. So seize
this opportunity and don't waste your signature with bullshit nobody will read.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]