[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: utf-8 cjk translation bug?

From: Jason Rumney
Subject: Re: utf-8 cjk translation bug?
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:34:51 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Dave Love wrote:

I would have expected them to have iso10646 fonts if they are using
utf-8 (for the sake of applications other than Emacs) but maybe that
isn't the case.

I think the problem is not that they don't have iso10646 fonts, it is
that the iso10646 fonts they do have do not contain any of the double
width characters, including double width roman that is in the 2500-33ff
range. Until Emacs gets a function to query which glyphs a font has (I
see such a function in emacs-unicode-2), then it is safer to use
localized fonts where possible instead of iso10646.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]