Re: Excessive delays on emacs-devel

[Kim F. Storm]

address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:

> It seems like emacs-devel is has recovered to some extent; at least
> two mails I (re)sent yesterday have appeared on the list, but with 12
> hours delay or so, so there is still something spooky going on...
> 
> BTW, I find it strange that the maintainers at mail.gnu.org didn't
> post a message to the list telling that there was a problem (with a
> short description of what is was), that mail to the list got lost, but
> that things are back to normal (which I still doubt they really are).

It is really BAD!!!

I just received this back from the list with 96 hours delay :-(

>> Received: from monty-python.gnu.org (monty-python.gnu.org [199.232.76.173])
>>      by ds12.enavn.org (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i29G20004327
>>      for <address@hidden>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:02:01 +0100
>> Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
>>      by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30)  id 1B0jEE-0005Rc-VI
>>      for address@hidden; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 10:33:10 -0500
>> Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30)
>>      id 1AzHO4-0002Ir-04
>>      for address@hidden; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:37:20 -0500
>> Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30)
>>      id 1AzHNT-00025r-6A
>>      for address@hidden; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:37:15 -0500
>> Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk)
>>      by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AzHNC-0001za-Af
>>      for address@hidden; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:36:26 -0500
>> Received: (qmail 10934 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2004 15:36:19 -0000
>> Received: from XXXXXXXX
>>      by 0 with SMTP; 5 Mar 2004 15:36:19 -0000

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk