[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Compilation to native

From: Juri Linkov
Subject: Re: Compilation to native
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:57:57 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)

> I only wondered why the TODO entry favoured CCL, as it was simpler to
> try the byte code first.  The changes to function calling required for
> the compiled byte code would count towards a similar effort for CCL.

As far as this TODO entry speaks about compilation, it is much
simpler to compile CCL than Emacs Lisp.  And AFAIU, it suggests
first to try compiling CCL bytecode to native code as opposed
to compiling Emacs Lisp bytecode to native code.

Juri Linkov

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]