[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dired-do-touch
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: dired-do-touch |
Date: |
24 Mar 2004 13:22:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > I think that this is acceptable behaviour on such systems.
>
> What is? to signal an error?
Ups -- no, that's not what I meant.
Let me try again:
> else more-or-less silently ignore errors in this function for
> directories on such systems.
I think that this is acceptable behaviour on such systems.
> > Maybe the function could simply return t if time was modified, nil
> > otherwise. Then it would be easier for a programmer to change his
> > code to deal with systems where the call fails.
>
> Yes, a good idea, IMHO.
So let's do it that way. Matt?
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: dired-do-touch, (continued)
- Re: dired-do-touch, Lars Hansen, 2004/03/21
- Re: dired-do-touch, Matthew Mundell, 2004/03/22
- Re: dired-do-touch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/03/23
- Re: dired-do-touch, Matthew Mundell, 2004/03/23
- Re: dired-do-touch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/03/24
- Re: dired-do-touch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/24
- Re: dired-do-touch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/03/24
- Re: dired-do-touch,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: dired-do-touch, Matthew Mundell, 2004/03/24
- Re: dired-do-touch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/03/25
- Re: dired-do-touch, Matthew Mundell, 2004/03/24
- Re: dired-do-touch, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/24
- Re: dired-do-touch, Matthew Mundell, 2004/03/26
- Re: dired-do-touch, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: dired-do-touch, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27