[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: diff-apply-hunk broken
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: diff-apply-hunk broken |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Apr 2004 07:23:18 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> At 02 Apr 2004 20:48:04 -0500, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> Is --label accepted by all known non-ancient diff implementations?
>>> Yes. --label has been supported ever since diffutils 2.0, released in
>>> 1992. These days it's safe to assume --label, if it's GNU diff.
>>
>> I can't assume GNU diff. So how about other system's `diff'?
>
> Some "diff" implementations lack -L, so portable applications cannot
> use "diff -L". For example, Solaris 9 "diff" lacks -L. -L is not
> standardized by POSIX.
>
> I recall that this is not a problem with GNU Emacs, as it tests
> whether diff supports -L (or --label) before using that option.
It seems that GNU Emacs have no such a test, but fortunately there
are only three files (diff.el, smerge-mode.el and vc.el) that use
a "-L" string, so it's not a problem to replace "-L" by "--label"
in these files.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/04/01
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Miles Bader, 2004/04/01
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/01
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/04/02
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/02
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/02
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/02
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/02
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/03
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken,
Juri Linkov <=