[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never).
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never). |
Date: |
Tue, 4 May 2004 19:23:34 -0500 (CDT) |
I personally believe that the most logical thing would be to call the
next release "21.4". The NEWS has always described all changes as to
be made in 21.4. Skipping a number like "21.5" might confuse people
and make them believe that there was a "21.4" which they somehow
"missed". If a sysadmin updates to 21.5, I am sure plenty of people
are going to believe there was a 21.4, which just never got updated
to, especially given the large amount of elapsed time. "22.0" might
be OK, but there is the lack of a really super-significant individual
change.
> But I don't really case if we call this 21.4, 21.5, or 22.0 -- as
> long as we release something in 2004 !!
Yes.
Of course, I would not really mind if it were called "21.5" either,
even though that would be my least favorite choice of the three.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., (continued)
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David Kastrup, 2004/05/04
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Richard Stallman, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David Kastrup, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Miles Bader, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David Kastrup, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never).,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David Kastrup, 2004/05/05
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Robert J. Chassell, 2004/05/04
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David PONCE, 2004/05/14