[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error-last-buffer
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: next-error-last-buffer |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Jun 2004 09:48:49 -0400 |
Occur mode binds "o" to `occur-mode-goto-occurrence-other-window' and
diff mode binds "o" to `diff-goto-source'. But since "o" should insert
the ?o character in other modes, I added "M-" key prefix. Though,
M-o is not needed too much.
I would rather not use up another binding for this. Please leave it out.
So as I understand, a general convention would be using forward-/backward-
prefix for commands that move the point only in the current compile/grep/...
buffer, and next-/previous- for commands which are invoked in the
source buffers.
I did not go that far. What I said is that the names
forward-/backward- are elsewhere used normally for commands that move
within the buffer. In fact, so are the names next- and previous-. In
this case, we are already using next- and previous- in a nonstandard
way, but that's no obstacle to using forward-/backward- in the
standard way here.
Using such names here is better than the available alternatives, so
let's use them.
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, (continued)
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/02
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/03
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/03
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/07
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/08
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/30
Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/01
Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/06/03
- Re: next-error-last-buffer,
Richard Stallman <=