[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error refactoring
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: next-error refactoring |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jun 2004 19:01:00 -0400 |
This can be applied to functions when their locations are listed in
another buffer by commands that operate on function names, for example,
`list-tags' (which is not "next-error" capable now),
That is a good idea. However, I don't see a need to change frameworks
based on that.
`list-imenu',
`list-outlines' (there are no such functions yet, but they would be useful).
I am not sure that a list-imenu command would make sense. But
we can add connections to next-error in other places where that
does make sense.
- Re: next-error refactoring, (continued)
- Re: next-error refactoring, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/07
- Re: next-error refactoring, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/03
- Re: next-error refactoring, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/07
- Re: next-error refactoring, Tak Ota, 2004/06/07
- Re: next-error refactoring, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/08
- Re: next-error refactoring, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/11
- Re: next-error refactoring, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/12
- Re: next-error refactoring, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/30
- Re: next-error refactoring, Stefan Monnier, 2004/06/09
- Re: next-error refactoring, Juri Linkov, 2004/06/09
- Re: next-error refactoring,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: next-error refactoring, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/02